🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those closest to the whales say the intense debate over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to put them down unless the government funds the upkeep of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and communal behavior point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something one caretaker learned directly.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“Eve accepted me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I view relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the park ascribes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The facility did not open to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand results of the closure. “Concrete is falling apart from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with fragments in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not comment to a request for comment, but earlier stated: “The whales … receive far superior health care and constant attention than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in early March following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park thought information of the death were leaked to the press and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant personnel”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She supports requests for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister rejected a request to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the request would have meant a continued situation in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the official wrote. “As Canadians, we know that belugas belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reveal a broader incorrect perception of the realities of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.

A proposed refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which now received regulatory clearance, has shown to be highly debated. The planned location, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, is not yet built. Advocates remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a permanent solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.

The project lead, director of the plan, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|