🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.